Thank you! That's extremely useful - definitely not concern trolling.
We recognize how important email is to our users, so we definitely want to resolve those issues!
We're incorporating some of the things you've already mentioned (client-side decryption, better sanitization), but we'll be a lot more cautious moving forward. You brought up really excellent points, so thank you for sharing those with us!
I could definitely use this tool but the privacy concerns would need to treated as be your #1 selling point along with user side encryption. The encryption could cost more but once a competitor arrives with these two necessities, I will sign up.
Understood! We'll be working on this asap :) Really appreciate your feedback.
Congratulations on the launch!
I hope you take to heart the privacy concerns here. In case you haven't come across it, here's a useful thread from last year about Unroll.me's datamining and selling of customers' inboxes, and the general trust problem for services like yours:
Frankly I'm not sure what it would take to convince me to open up email text access to a 3rd party service at this point.
You have to convince me not just that you (Fil, Lambert and Matt) are trustworthy, but also that the three of you can't be bought out by someone less trustworthy (bearing in mind that your customers may well be worth more to a shady business than they are to you!), and also that you're competent to run a hugely valuable database without ever making a mistake (quoting tptacek in the above thread: in your place, "I would be terrified.")
I don't know how you would crack this, but on the risk-of-hacking side as a user I might be looking for technical reassurance -- say, that you're running entirely locally instead of storing my email on your server in the first place, or that you're only using temporary email access to store sentences with k-anonymity or client-side encryption, and that your privacy model has been published in detail for review.
On the risk-of-purchase side you could look at Keith Porcaro and Sean McDonald's idea of the Civic Trust, where a private company's data is owned by an independent trust that can protect the interests of your users, separate from the vagaries of your business model:
My feedback here may amount to concern trolling, since I'm over on the paranoid end of potential customers these days and probably not your target audience -- but I'm passing it on in case it's helpful ...
We're working on a business version of the product, which will be a monthly fee on a per user basis. We're unsure of the exact pricing yet.
It definitely isn't slow for all users! However, there are some that send so many emails that any incremental speed-up is very helpful.
Plus, we're looking to start working on mobile, where it should be most useful!
I think it's more than incremental speed up - it's the amount of mindspace it takes.
Very interesting, I haven't really thought of it that way.
Do you mean we essentially lower the barrier to you starting to write an email?
If that's the case, that's a fascinating insight - thank you so much for sharing it!
Yes, common email replies are fast. It is composing a new email to a new person that was not written before and cannot be seen in my sent folder that is difficult. AI can be done by using the receiver email and subject of the email to produce content.
What is the plan to make money off this? Sell what you read in my emails? Charge me a monthly fee at some point? Also my initial reaction was that I wasn't aware that composing an email is slow.
That was my first thought as well.
My second thought was the Cory Doctorow story which predicted that the first true AI will be the result of a machine learning spambot and a machine learning antispam bot getting stuck in an arms race.
This tech would make for an excellent means for spammers and malware authors to bypass spam filters easily.
2)Generate new content based on old emails.
Or more simpler:
Use same content,
Sadly I came across this before
Oh man hahah, that's gotten dark real quick! Promise we're not trying to do that
Never read it, but I just looked it up and will order it soon. Gotta make sure we don't make the same mistakes ;)
Definitely not something we're going after, haha!
Have you read Avogadro Corp (http://avogadrocorp.com/ )? That novel is based on the premise of a tool that is intended to help you write well-crafted emails yet quickly gets out of hand.
I'm not suggesting at all this will be the case here but this seems related and might be an interesting read.
Awesome insight, thanks so much! I'd love to chat with you about that - anything you're specifically looking for out of the product?
Chatalytics.co does this already and integrates with Zendesk.
As someone who runs a support team I saw this and immediately thought “this needs to be a zendesk app.”
There is a lot of knowledge hidden in support ticket replies but it’s didficult to know what other team members previous answers would be useful to crib from without guessing search terms. Heck you may even forget exactly how to find your own answer from a few months ago.
On top of that there are concepts we have to communicate all the time as building blocks of a reply, which is where it seems this service may thrive. Let me know when you need beta testers for the zendesk version :-D
Awesome! so happy to hear you've enjoyed it so far.
We've got a ton of additional things coming up for you, and no, they're not going to make us SmartReply!
Almost definitely a yes to an Outlook extension coming up - we're just making sure now that we're doing a good enough job on Gmail before we start porting over to another platform :)
Hey - any chance you could email me at firstname.lastname@example.org? I'd love to set up a phone call to hear how we could be better for you. Thanks!
OK, I'm loving a couple of things:
1. As someone in sales, there are a truckload of emails I send out each day. Contrary to what a lot of people think, no, we don't send out templated stuff blindly. I think EE should be able to help me shave off about half an hour in think-time in a a day. Huge.
2. Organic-ish. Early days, I know, but I'm hoping that EE won't devolve to a glorified SmartReply with additional text templates.
3. There's a roadmap for pro-users. Which means at some point of time, there _might_ just be an Outlook/Polymail plugin(please say yes). Which is when I absolutely win. :-) Also, it's nice to be relatively assured that your data isn't likely to be sold.
We're already starting to work on calendar integration to help you out with scheduling. Over time, we plan on improving more and more parts of your email - task management, figuring out which emails are the top ones for you to read and reply to, who you should reach out to etc.
That's just a few ideas that we've been thinking about - would really love to hear if you have any suggestions!
What is on the roadmap for this service? You have hotkeys and autocomplete which means I can write emails more quickly. You have access to my email / history of digital life (contacts, relationships, connections, brands I am willing to let get into my inbox, etc): what will you do with this data to further improve the email experience?
Thanks so much for all the feedback, I really appreciate it.
2. So sorry, definitely don't want to hide anything! We'll push out the changes asap to show our users how to remove your permissions. We stop looking at your data once you uninstall (even if you don't revoke permissions).
3.Sorry about that! You can remove it easily in the "EasyEmail" control panel - just hit "Settings" and you can uncheck the button
4. We'll keep getting better! Thanks for pointing out that we're suggesting some generic sentences - this tends to happen when the user didn't send a lot of emails from a given email address (which means there's not a lot of data to learn from.)
Again, thank you so much for your feedback. We'll get right to fixing all the problems!
Hey, Didn't see it on the webpage store. I expected it to be on the welcome message I saw in the store. Probably due to similar experiences.
Yes, you need to remove permissions. That is absolutely imperative. Do you delete the data after uninstall?
Perhaps give an option checkbox in your initial walkthrough of the app to allow the footer only on emails using EasyEmail.
I retracted #4. The first email I got after the loading robot screen made me think the "learning" was complete. I got an email much later saying it was complete. The UX confused me. Perhaps instead of popping up generic message before the learning is done, you can show a message, still analyzing data. So I cannot in good faith comment on the suggestion quality.
Got it, makes sense. I'll make sure to update that soon! Thank you for the suggestion.
We delete data the second we don't have access to users' account. However, we don't store any new data after you uninstall us. The reason is that there's actually no way of tracking who uninstalls us - Chrome Extensions are not providing any real support for it. We're looking into it, and will retroactively remove all data from users who uninstalled us.
Brilliant idea! We'll make the checkbox more visible!
Got it, sorry about that. Please let me know what you think once you get some time to play with the extension! Thank you so much again for the feedback, it's incredibly valuable.
I find a couple things irksome, if not malicious.
2. If I uninstall your extension you have it programmed to give me an exit survey, but it doesn't prompt me to revoke access for your app from my account? So you can continue to read all my communications. At the very least tell me how to remove it when I uninstall your extension, or fill out your exit survey. Don't just hide the fact that you retain access indefinitely.
3. You are appending your marketing to the bottom of every email regardless if it used your product or not. Thats crap, I don't want to spam every single person I communicate with. Let me opt in, or only append when your plugin is used.
I get its a prototype, I get the "potential", but it seems you put 0 critical thought into making the app safe.
Chrome extension is our MVP actually - over time we will certainly expand to other platforms (or even have our own email client!). We're already in the process for setting up a Gmail Add-on (https://blog.google/products/g-suite/do-more-your-inbox-gmai...)
It also seems like we can keep going with a Chrome Extension for a bit - Streak, MixMax or even Grammarly are good examples of companies who are focused around a Chrome extension.
What other platforms do you think we could focus on? Where would you like to see us most?
Yea I understand now. Indeed, companies such as Streak, Grammarly etc. are good examples.
A lot of action nowadays happen on Mobile. How would this help with that?
We're already developing a Gmail Add-on, which will work on mobile! We're looking to go into mobile as soon as possible
I think the fact that it looks like toy is a plus to YC.
Great founders + (seemingly) toy/stupid/too hard ideas = how YC selects.
I think along with this TOY-ness, YC also looks for the available market and in this case I do not see that with this app. maybe the idea is to get some traction and sell it to Google down the road?
That's good feedback - why do you think the available market is small?
That's certainly a possibility, but for now we're just really focused on making the product really useful.
I maybe wrong but I see the email market in two ways: people who have two many emails which creates a scheduling problem. And people who reply/compose too many emails. I think the later market is not that big because you also need to make sure the people get more value (or should I say, write more emails) out of the monthly fees they pay for the service. But I'd like to be wrong here and I wish you succeed. Thanks.
Thanks for the support! Really appreciate that :)
It is interesting to see Chrome Plugins being accepted into YC. Is the potential really worth a billion dollar market ? I would think that YC wants to invest in startups that could scale to high growth in a short span of time. Are Chrome plugins really worth that much ?
Or perhaps this is just the MVP and idea is to scale it further ?
Really great idea! I put it down so that we can work on it in the near future.
There seems to be a lot of privacy issues with attachments. Do you have any suggestion on how you'd like us to deal with it? Is it something you're worried about at all?
I'd like to see you auto suggest frequent attachments. In some ways this should be a more accessible feature, and certainly useful.
Glad to hear we've been useful! Looking forward to more feedback in the future :)
I've been testing easymail for a couple weeks (the gmail add-on and the chrome plugin). So far a very positive experience - saves me time on repetitive emails. Looking forward to updates & more AI.
Sorry to hear that! I'd love to find out more about how we could resolve that issue.
Privacy and security are extremely high on our priority list since email is such an intimate communication channel.
> I'd love to find out more about how we could resolve that issue.
It's possible, though not easy, for a limited form of client-side encryption to be used while still offering autocomplete; e.g. if each word is encrypted client-side with a per-client secret, an encrypted "next word" could be determined and returned without the server ever knowing the specific words and sentences it operated on (other than length).
There are other caveats here.
> Privacy and security are extremely high on our priority list
We're working on client-side encryption right now actually, which will further help us be better about your privacy.
The only people who can read email sentences are our researchers - and even then the sentences are not identifiable. They are obviously bound by very restrictive NDAs.
I don't think this would be practically possible. As these guys have to improve algorithm for better suggestion, someone has to look at the suggestion and the context to improve the algorithm.
I would love to use you service but it is not acceptable for me to share my email contents with someone else. Look at how mega cloud storage are protecting users files
> personal assistant that can automatically reply for you
That would make me redundant. 4 hr work week, I am coming.
Thanks so much! Really happy to hear that you like our idea.
Please shoot me any feedback you have at email@example.com. I want to make sure you have the best possible experience!
This is awesome guys. To reply to all the people that are like this is not a big enough problem, tell them that this is the start and then tell them what is the next stage of your company.
To me, it sounds like a personal assistant that can automatically reply for you to fairly complex emails. We get SO MUCH email, maybe this will actually help us manage all that.
It is a very powerful idea, all the best to you.
We just released it two weeks ago, so we're just looking to get loads of feedback as we're improving our tech to finally create a business version of it.
We've got no plans whatsoever to sell anyone's data - we'll be a good ol' regular SaaS product for business with a free version for personal use.
I’m very apprehensive about using something that doesn’t charge me but reads my e-mail.
Then again it’s a gmail plugin :P
We get used in 15% of emails on average. That number tends to vary a lot from user to user though - we've got a few users who use us in 80% of their emails, and some that use us very sporadically.
We don't have a number for the percentage of usage for what the user specifically types, but it sounds like definitely something we should have, so thanks for the suggestion!
> We don't have a number for the percentage of usage for what the user specifically types, but it sounds like definitely something we should have
It sounds like a violation of user privacy. Data-collection and privacy is a fine line, and I'm pretty sure any numbers related to specific text users type in private communication being surfaced up to humans is across that line.
I'm fine with my phone keyboard suggesting next words. I would not be fine with a human looking at the data model for specific sentences and words, even in aggregate.
Could you elaborate on that a bit? There's no one looking at your data in real time.
Do you have numbers around how often autocomplete is used? For example, using your "how a" example, what percentage of time will a user select a suggested autocomplete?
Do you guys feel like your product could replace mail merges?
Awesome, what are your initial thoughts? Would love to make it better for you. We'll be rolling out calendar integration in a day or two, so stay tuned
I'll give it a fair shake, then report back :)
Great, looking forward to it!
So far, I find it marginally useful. The replies it suggests are either too specific (e.g. "We have" -> "We have been working on it since"), too trivial ("Thank y" -> "Thank you!"), or contain artifacts ("ph0rque" -> "phorque <").
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
Just added the extension. Curious why you need access to my calendar?
Whats the difference between Launch HN and Show HN?
Yes... curious about it too. I am seeing many of my colleagues switch from Chromium to FF. The new version is a magnitute faster than anything I have used.
Fun fact - Edge browser on Android is actually my default browser for the last 2 months and I love it.
No love for Firefox?